Volume 7, Issue 2, March 2018, Page: 40-42
The Clinical Significance and Diagnostic Value of Echogenic Intracavitary Foci in Fetal Heart
Li Kaiwen, Department of Ultrasound, Jingzhou Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China
Received: Mar. 27, 2018;       Accepted: Apr. 11, 2018;       Published: May 11, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.cmr.20180702.11      View  888      Downloads  46
Abstract
This paper aims at investigating the clinical significance and diagnostic value of fetal echocardiography in the detection of echogenic intracavitary foci (EIF). Then, it analyzed the ultrasonic features of the intensive echocardiography from June 2016 to June 2017, which were found in 535 mid-term (20-26 weeks) fetuses, and performed the echocardiographic follow-up during the third trimester and after birth. As a result, in 535 fetuses, 502 cases of late pregnancy (35~40 weeks) showed that the echo in the intracardiac hyperechogenic focus declined or disappeared. The intracardiac echo foci still existed in 33 cases after birth, which disappeared in 3~6 months. Finally, it is concluded that fetal intracerebral echogenic lesions are mostly transient ultrasonography with favorable prognosis.
Keywords
Clinical Significance, Diagnostic Value, Echogenic Intracavitary Foci (EFI), Fetal Heart
To cite this article
Li Kaiwen, The Clinical Significance and Diagnostic Value of Echogenic Intracavitary Foci in Fetal Heart, Clinical Medicine Research. Vol. 7, No. 2, 2018, pp. 40-42. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.20180702.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Liang Yiqi. Comparative study of echocardiographic anatomy of fetal heart with or without cardiac chamber [J]. Imaging technology, 2016 (1):22-23.
[2]
Xing Min, Yang self, Wan Mei. Echocardiographic detection of fetal ventricular echogenic plaques and postnatal tracking analysis [J]. Defense Medical Journal of South China, 2016, 30 (4): 250-252.
[3]
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.AIUM practice guide—line for the performance of fetal echocardiography [J].Ultrasound Med, 2013, 32 (6):1067-1082.
[4]
Zhang Jing, Zhou Qichang, Zhang Ming et al. Study on the hemodynamic changes of fetal ventricular dysplasia by Doppler ultrasonography [J]. Chinese Journal of ultrasound imaging, 2012, 21 (4):296-299.
[5]
He Yihua. Fetal echocardiography [M]. Beijing: People's Health Press, 2013:325.
[6]
Allan LD.Mannual of fetal echocardiography [M]. London:MTP Press, 1986:134.
[7]
Pei Lei. Analysis of the clinical significance of intraventricular hyperechoic foci in fetal B-ultrasound [J]. Chinese Journal of eugenics and genetics, 2010, 18 (11):102-104.
[8]
Smith—Bindman R, HosmerW, Feldstein VA, et a1. Second—trimester ultrasound to detect fetuseswith Down syndrome:ameta-analysis [J]. JAMA, 2001, 285:1044-1055.
[9]
Lu Qing, flanking, Ren Fei. Analysis of fetal ventricular echogenic plaque in 367 cases pregnancy outcome [J]. Journal of Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities, 2017, 39 (2): 121-122.
[10]
Li Xuemei, Feng Xinheng, Li Jingfu. Clinical significance of prenatal echocardiographic fetal ventricular echo location [J]. Chinese oligogenics magazine, 2016, 24 (12):841 842.
Browse journals by subject